↓ Skip to main content

A review of heterogeneous data mining for brain disorder identification

Overview of attention for article published in Brain Informatics, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#29 of 103)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
Title
A review of heterogeneous data mining for brain disorder identification
Published in
Brain Informatics, September 2015
DOI 10.1007/s40708-015-0021-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bokai Cao, Xiangnan Kong, Philip S. Yu

Abstract

With rapid advances in neuroimaging techniques, the research on brain disorder identification has become an emerging area in the data mining community. Brain disorder data poses many unique challenges for data mining research. For example, the raw data generated by neuroimaging experiments is in tensor representations, with typical characteristics of high dimensionality, structural complexity, and nonlinear separability. Furthermore, brain connectivity networks can be constructed from the tensor data, embedding subtle interactions between brain regions. Other clinical measures are usually available reflecting the disease status from different perspectives. It is expected that integrating complementary information in the tensor data and the brain network data, and incorporating other clinical parameters will be potentially transformative for investigating disease mechanisms and for informing therapeutic interventions. Many research efforts have been devoted to this area. They have achieved great success in various applications, such as tensor-based modeling, subgraph pattern mining, and multi-view feature analysis. In this paper, we review some recent data mining methods that are used for analyzing brain disorders.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
China 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
France 1 2%
Unknown 54 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 21%
Student > Bachelor 10 17%
Student > Master 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Researcher 5 9%
Other 11 19%
Unknown 10 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 24 41%
Engineering 8 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 13 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2015.
All research outputs
#5,942,633
of 22,985,065 outputs
Outputs from Brain Informatics
#29
of 103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,824
of 274,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Informatics
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,985,065 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,760 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.