| Title |
Evolutionary Development in Australopithecus africanus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Evolutionary Biology, April 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11692-012-9172-9 |
| Authors |
Kieran P. McNulty |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| Greece | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 46 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 28% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 17% |
| Researcher | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 21% |
| Unknown | 4 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 51% |
| Arts and Humanities | 7 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2013.
All research outputs
#5,655,726
of 22,985,065 outputs
Outputs from Evolutionary Biology
#103
of 314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,968
of 161,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Evolutionary Biology
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,985,065 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,798 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.