| Title |
Eccentric exercise-induced muscle damage of pre-adolescent and adolescent boys in comparison to young men
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Applied Physiology, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00421-014-2848-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Trevor C. Chen, Hsin-Lian Chen, Yi-Chuen Liu, Kazunori Nosaka |
| Abstract |
This study compared changes in indirect muscle damage markers after maximal eccentric exercise of the elbow flexors (EF) among pre-adolescent (9-10 years), adolescent (14-15 years) and post-adolescent (20-25 years) men to test the hypothesis that the magnitude of muscle damage would increase with increase in age. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
| Qatar | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 102 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 14% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Researcher | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 22 | 21% |
| Unknown | 18 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 40 | 37% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 14% |
| Unknown | 24 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2014.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#3,318
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,219
of 239,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#33
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,807 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.