| Title |
Why was Darwin’s view of species rejected by twentieth century biologists?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biology & Philosophy, May 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10539-010-9213-7 |
| Authors |
James Mallet |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 4% |
| Spain | 4 | 2% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 3% |
| Unknown | 184 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 50 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 9% |
| Professor | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 50 | 23% |
| Unknown | 22 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 123 | 58% |
| Philosophy | 16 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 21 | 10% |
| Unknown | 29 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2021.
All research outputs
#2,212,396
of 22,985,065 outputs
Outputs from Biology & Philosophy
#68
of 663 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,210
of 96,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology & Philosophy
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,985,065 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 663 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,083 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.