↓ Skip to main content

Analyzing Global Governance Failure: A Philosophical Framework

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, June 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Analyzing Global Governance Failure: A Philosophical Framework
Published in
Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, June 2003
DOI 10.1023/a:1023816520367
Authors

John Dixon, Rhys Dogan

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2022.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice
#146
of 376 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,501
of 53,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 376 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 53,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them