↓ Skip to main content

Marginal copper deficiency and atherosclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Trace Element Research, January 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Marginal copper deficiency and atherosclerosis
Published in
Biological Trace Element Research, January 2000
DOI 10.1385/bter:78:1-3:179
Pubmed ID
Authors

Iona M. J. Hamilton, William S. Gilmore, J. J. Strain

Abstract

Copper is an essential trace element in the maintenance of the cardiovascular system. Copper-deficient diets can elicit, in animals, structural and functional changes that are comparable to those observed in coronary heart disease. In this study, the effect of dietary-induced copper deficiency on aortic lesion development was measured by quantitative image analysis in C57BL/6 mice that are susceptible to diet-induced aortic lesions. The diets administered were severely copper deficient (0.2 mg/kg diet), marginally deficient (0.6 mg/kg diet), or copper adequate (6.0 mg/kg diet). Similarly, increased aortic lesion areas and elevated serum cholesterol were demonstrated in both deficient groups, compared with the copper-adequate group. Evidence for graded differences in copper status among the dietary groups was shown by the dose-response increase in liver copper concentration, copper-zinc superoxide dismutase and cytochrome-c oxidase activities, together with serum caeruloplasmin oxidase with increasing intakes of dietary copper. Despite the difference in copper status between the copper marginal and severely deficient groups, similar lesions found in both groups of mice suggest a threshold effect of copper deficiency on lesion formation.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 4%
Unknown 24 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 20%
Student > Master 5 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 16%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 8%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 3 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 20%
Environmental Science 3 12%
Chemistry 2 8%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 3 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2010.
All research outputs
#3,798,287
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Biological Trace Element Research
#212
of 2,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,330
of 109,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Trace Element Research
#2
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,336 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,780 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.