Title |
Agricultural work related injury and Ill-health and the economic cost
|
---|---|
Published in |
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, September 1999
|
DOI | 10.1007/bf02987623 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Melville H. Litchfield |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Colombia | 1 | 1% |
Nepal | 1 | 1% |
Malaysia | 1 | 1% |
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
India | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 66 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 13 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 14% |
Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 7% |
Other | 14 | 20% |
Unknown | 11 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 16 | 23% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 20% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 8% |
Environmental Science | 5 | 7% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 6% |
Other | 11 | 15% |
Unknown | 15 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2014.
All research outputs
#5,033,437
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
#973
of 9,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,328
of 35,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,883 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 35,673 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them