↓ Skip to main content

日本行動分析学会「体罰」に反対する声明

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Behavior Analysis, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 116)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
121 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
日本行動分析学会「体罰」に反対する声明
Published in
Japanese Journal of Behavior Analysis, June 2017
DOI 10.24456/jjba.29.2_96
Authors

島宗 理, 吉野 俊彦, 大久保 賢一, 奥田 健次, 杉山 尚子, 中島 定彦, 長谷川 芳典, 平澤 紀子, 眞邉 一近, 山本 央子

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 121 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 94. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2023.
All research outputs
#461,499
of 25,859,234 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Behavior Analysis
#2
of 116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,568
of 333,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Behavior Analysis
#2
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,859,234 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 116 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,119 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.