↓ Skip to main content

The Association of Early Life Supplemental Nutrition With Lean Body Mass and Grip Strength in Adulthood: Evidence From APCAPS

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Epidemiology, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Association of Early Life Supplemental Nutrition With Lean Body Mass and Grip Strength in Adulthood: Evidence From APCAPS
Published in
American Journal of Epidemiology, February 2014
DOI 10.1093/aje/kwt332
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bharati Kulkarni, Hannah Kuper, K. V. Radhakrishna, Andrew P. Hills, Nuala M. Byrne, Amy Taylor, Ruth Sullivan, Liza Bowen, Jonathan C. Wells, Yoav Ben-Shlomo, George Davey Smith, Shah Ebrahim, Sanjay Kinra

Abstract

In the present study, we examined the associations of early nutrition with adult lean body mass (LBM) and muscle strength in a birth cohort that was established to assess the long-term impact of a nutrition program. Participants (n = 1,446, 32% female) were born near Hyderabad, India, in 29 villages from 1987 to 1990, during which time only intervention villages (n = 15) had a government program that offered balanced protein-calorie supplementation to pregnant women and children. Participants' LBM and appendicular skeletal muscle mass were measured using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry; grip strength and information on lifestyle indicators, including diet and physical activity level, were also obtained. Ages (mean = 20.3 years) and body mass indexes (weight (kg)/height (m)(2); mean = 19.5) of participants in 2 groups were similar. Current dietary energy intake was higher in the intervention group. Unadjusted LBM and grip strength were similar in 2 groups. After adjustment for potential confounders, the intervention group had lower LBM (β = -0.75; P = 0.03), appendicular skeletal muscle mass, and grip strength than did controls, but these differences were small in magnitude (<0.1 standard deviation). Multivariable regression analyses showed that current socioeconomic position, energy intake, and physical activity level had a positive association with adult LBM and muscle strength. This study could not detect a "programming" effect of early nutrition supplementation on adult LBM and muscle strength.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 115 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 20%
Researcher 17 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 14%
Student > Bachelor 13 11%
Student > Postgraduate 6 5%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 28 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 10%
Social Sciences 9 8%
Sports and Recreations 8 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Other 23 20%
Unknown 31 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2015.
All research outputs
#7,444,851
of 25,626,416 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Epidemiology
#4,717
of 9,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,261
of 239,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Epidemiology
#35
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,626,416 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,009 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.0. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,494 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.