↓ Skip to main content

A case of sting wounds of the oral mucosa caused by spermatophores of a raw squid

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A case of sting wounds of the oral mucosa caused by spermatophores of a raw squid
Published in
Japanese Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, January 2012
DOI 10.5794/jjoms.58.600
Authors

Tadahiro SHIMOMURA, Kazuhiko YAMAMOTO, Miyako KURIHARA, Takahiro YAGYUU, Risa TAKANO, Tadaaki KIRITA

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2022.
All research outputs
#4,323,555
of 25,660,026 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
#3
of 92 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,551
of 251,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,660,026 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 92 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,263 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them