| Title |
Telemetry and Satellite Tracking of Whale Sharks, Rhincodon Typus, in the Sea of Cortez, Mexico, and the North Pacific Ocean
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Biology of Fishes, February 2001
|
| DOI | 10.1023/a:1007674716437 |
| Authors |
Scott A. Eckert, Brent S. Stewart |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 286 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 5 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 2 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 3% |
| Unknown | 260 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 59 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 53 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 44 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 41 | 14% |
| Other | 15 | 5% |
| Other | 35 | 12% |
| Unknown | 39 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 156 | 55% |
| Environmental Science | 57 | 20% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 10 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 12 | 4% |
| Unknown | 43 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2022.
All research outputs
#1,799,144
of 23,548,905 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Biology of Fishes
#76
of 1,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,858
of 115,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Biology of Fishes
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,548,905 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,798 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 115,209 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.