↓ Skip to main content

Effect of Antibiotic Therapy on Human Fecal Microbiota and the Relation to the Development of Clostridium difficile

Overview of attention for article published in Microbial Ecology, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
139 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Effect of Antibiotic Therapy on Human Fecal Microbiota and the Relation to the Development of Clostridium difficile
Published in
Microbial Ecology, January 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00248-007-9356-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. F. De La Cochetière, T. Durand, V. Lalande, J. C. Petit, G. Potel, L. Beaugerie

Abstract

The gastrointestinal tract is a complex ecosystem. Recent studies have shown that the human fecal microbiota is composed of a consortium of microorganism. It is known that antibiotic treatment alters the microbiota, facilitating the proliferation of opportunists that may occupy ecological niches previously unavailable to them. It is therefore important to characterize resident microbiota to evaluate its latent ability to permit the development of pathogens such as Clostridium difficile. Using samples from 260 subjects enrolled in a previously published clinical study on antibiotic-associated diarrhea, we investigated the possible relationship between the fecal dominant resident microbiota and the subsequent development of C. difficile. We used molecular profiling of bacterial 16S rDNA coupled with partial least square (PLS) regression analysis. Fecal samples were collected on day 0 (D0) before antibiotic treatment and on day 14 (D14) after the beginning of the treatment. Fecal DNA was isolated, and V6-to-V8 regions of the 16S rDNA were amplified by polymerase chain reaction with general primers and analyzed by temporal temperature gradient gel electrophoresis (TTGE). Main bacteria profiles were compared on the basis of similarity (Pearson correlation coefficient). The characteristics of the microbiota were determined using PLS discriminant analysis model. Eighty-seven TTGE profiles on D0 have been analyzed. The banding pattern was complex in all cases. The subsequent onset of C. difficile was not revealed by any clustering of TTGE profiles, but was explained up to 46% by the corresponding PLS model. Furthermore, 6 zones out of the 438 dispatched from the TTGE profiles by the software happened to be specific for the group of patients who acquired C. difficile. The first approach in the molecular phylogenetic analysis showed related sequences to uncultured clones. As for the 87 TTGE profiles on D14, no clustering could be found either, but the subsequent onset of C. difficile was explained up to 74.5% by the corresponding PLS model, thus corroborating the results found on D0. The non exhaustive data of the microbiota we found should be taken as the first step to assess the hypothesis of permissive microbiota. The PLS model was used successfully to predict C. difficile development. We found that important criteria in terms of main bacteria could be markedly considered as predisposing factors for C. difficile development. Yet, the resident microbiota in case of antibiotic-associated diarrhea has still to be analyzed. Furthermore, these findings suggest that strategies reinforcing the ability of the fecal microbiota to resist to modifications would be of clinical relevance.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Spain 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 126 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 15%
Student > Master 17 12%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Other 34 24%
Unknown 16 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 48 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 29 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 2%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 22 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2014.
All research outputs
#15,295,786
of 22,747,498 outputs
Outputs from Microbial Ecology
#1,462
of 2,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,185
of 155,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbial Ecology
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,747,498 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,053 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,278 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.