You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Trends and biases in the listing and recovery planning for threatened species: an Australian case study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Oryx, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1017/s003060531100161x |
| Authors |
Jessica C. Walsh, James E. M. Watson, Madeleine C. Bottrill, Liana N. Joseph, Hugh P. Possingham |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 4 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 97 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 17% |
| Researcher | 17 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 11% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 15% |
| Unknown | 20 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 39 | 38% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 34 | 33% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 22 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 73. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2023.
All research outputs
#514,839
of 23,415,749 outputs
Outputs from Oryx
#75
of 1,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,815
of 177,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oryx
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,415,749 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,957 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,494 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.