| Title |
Beyond the “General Public”: Implications of Audience Characteristics for Promoting Species Conservation in the Western Ghats Hotspot, India
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ambio, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13280-013-0434-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Arun Kanagavel, Rajeev Raghavan, Diogo Veríssimo |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 156 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 11% |
| Researcher | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 11% |
| Unknown | 76 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 19% |
| Environmental Science | 28 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 1% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Unknown | 78 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2014.
All research outputs
#4,499,159
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Ambio
#829
of 1,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,629
of 214,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambio
#7
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,954 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,665 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.