| Title |
Evidence and rationale for the World Health Organization recommended standards for Japanese encephalitis surveillance
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Infectious Diseases, December 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2334-9-214 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Susan Hills, Alya Dabbagh, Julie Jacobson, Anthony Marfin, David Featherstone, Joachim Hombach, Pem Namgyal, Manju Rani, Tom Solomon, the Japanese Encephalitis Core Working Group |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Uzbekistan | 1 | 2% |
| China | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 60 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 13% |
| Librarian | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 25% |
| Unknown | 9 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 43% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 16% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 13 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2012.
All research outputs
#7,532,940
of 22,985,065 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#2,579
of 7,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,772
of 164,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#10
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,985,065 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,717 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,842 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.