↓ Skip to main content

Effect of GABAergic inhibition on odorant concentration coding in mushroom body intrinsic neurons of the honeybee

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Comparative Physiology A, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
Title
Effect of GABAergic inhibition on odorant concentration coding in mushroom body intrinsic neurons of the honeybee
Published in
Journal of Comparative Physiology A, December 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00359-013-0877-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anja Froese, Paul Szyszka, Randolf Menzel

Abstract

Kenyon cells, the intrinsic neurons of the insect mushroom body, have the intriguing property of responding in a sparse way to odorants. Sparse neuronal codes are often invariant to changes in stimulus intensity and duration, and sparse coding often depends on global inhibition. We tested if this is the case for honeybees' Kenyon cells, too, and used in vivo Ca²⁺ imaging to record their responses to different odorant concentrations. Kenyon cells responded not only to the onset of odorant stimuli (ON responses), but also to their termination (OFF responses). Both, ON and OFF responses increased with increasing odorant concentration. ON responses were phasic and invariant to the duration of odorant stimuli, while OFF responses increased with increasing odorant duration. Pharmacological blocking of GABA receptors in the brain revealed that ionotropic GABA(A) and metabotropic GABA(B) receptors attenuate Kenyon cells' ON responses without changing their OFF responses. Ionotropic GABA(A) receptors attenuated Kenyon cell ON responses more strongly than metabotropic GABA(B) receptors. However, the response dynamic, temporal resolution and paired-pulse depression did not depend on GABA(A) transmission. These data are discussed in the context of mechanisms leading to sparse coding in Kenyon cells.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 6%
United Kingdom 2 4%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 46 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 27%
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Professor 3 6%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 7 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 50%
Neuroscience 10 19%
Physics and Astronomy 4 8%
Computer Science 3 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 6 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2014.
All research outputs
#16,049,105
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#1,059
of 1,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,658
of 310,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#7
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,450 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,735 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.