| Title |
Eating disorders in adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Acta Diabetologica, July 1999
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s005920050140 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
A. Verrotti, M. Catino, F.A. De Luca, G. Morgese, F. Chiarelli |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 47 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 21% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 19% |
| Unknown | 8 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 29% |
| Psychology | 10 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 11 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2007.
All research outputs
#3,740,995
of 22,985,065 outputs
Outputs from Acta Diabetologica
#112
of 925 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,120
of 34,998 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Diabetologica
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,985,065 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 925 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 34,998 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them