Title |
Real-time telediagnosis of radiological images through an asynchronous transfer mode network: The ARTeMeD project
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Digital Imaging, August 1997
|
DOI | 10.1007/bf03168673 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Raffaele Noro, Jean -Pierre Hubaux, Reto Meuli, Ricardo Norberto Laurini, René Patthey |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 22% |
Student > Master | 3 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 17% |
Other | 2 | 11% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 11% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 3 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 3 | 17% |
Engineering | 3 | 17% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 17% |
Arts and Humanities | 2 | 11% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 11% |
Unknown | 4 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2019.
All research outputs
#4,746,961
of 22,985,065 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Digital Imaging
#169
of 1,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,142
of 29,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Digital Imaging
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,985,065 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,059 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,454 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.