↓ Skip to main content

First integrative trend analysis for a great ape species in Borneo

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
22 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
65 X users
facebook
8 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
175 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
First integrative trend analysis for a great ape species in Borneo
Published in
Scientific Reports, July 2017
DOI 10.1038/s41598-017-04435-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Truly Santika, Marc Ancrenaz, Kerrie A. Wilson, Stephanie Spehar, Nicola Abram, Graham L. Banes, Gail Campbell-Smith, Lisa Curran, Laura d’Arcy, Roberto A. Delgado, Andi Erman, Benoit Goossens, Herlina Hartanto, Max Houghton, Simon J. Husson, Hjalmar S. Kühl, Isabelle Lackman, Ashley Leiman, Karmele Llano Sanchez, Niel Makinuddin, Andrew J. Marshall, Ari Meididit, Kerrie Mengersen, Musnanda, Nardiyono, Anton Nurcahyo, Kisar Odom, Adventus Panda, Didik Prasetyo, Purnomo, Andjar Rafiastanto, Slamet Raharjo, Dessy Ratnasari, Anne E. Russon, Adi H. Santana, Eddy Santoso, Iman Sapari, Jamartin Sihite, Ahmat Suyoko, Albertus Tjiu, Sri Suci Utami-Atmoko, Carel P. van Schaik, Maria Voigt, Jessie Wells, Serge A. Wich, Erik P. Willems, Erik Meijaard

Abstract

For many threatened species the rate and drivers of population decline are difficult to assess accurately: species' surveys are typically restricted to small geographic areas, are conducted over short time periods, and employ a wide range of survey protocols. We addressed methodological challenges for assessing change in the abundance of an endangered species. We applied novel methods for integrating field and interview survey data for the critically endangered Bornean orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus), allowing a deeper understanding of the species' persistence through time. Our analysis revealed that Bornean orangutan populations have declined at a rate of 25% over the last 10 years. Survival rates of the species are lowest in areas with intermediate rainfall, where complex interrelations between soil fertility, agricultural productivity, and human settlement patterns influence persistence. These areas also have highest threats from human-wildlife conflict. Survival rates are further positively associated with forest extent, but are lower in areas where surrounding forest has been recently converted to industrial agriculture. Our study highlights the urgency of determining specific management interventions needed in different locations to counter the trend of decline and its associated drivers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 65 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 175 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 18%
Researcher 24 14%
Student > Bachelor 24 14%
Other 14 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 7%
Other 29 17%
Unknown 40 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 25%
Environmental Science 39 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 8%
Social Sciences 9 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 2%
Other 17 10%
Unknown 48 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 238. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2022.
All research outputs
#157,444
of 25,383,344 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#1,898
of 139,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,302
of 316,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#57
of 5,170 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,383,344 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 139,957 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,560 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,170 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.