↓ Skip to main content

Laboratory detection of leucocyte esterase and nitrite as an alternative to urine microscopy

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, August 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Laboratory detection of leucocyte esterase and nitrite as an alternative to urine microscopy
Published in
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, August 1996
DOI 10.1007/bf01691154
Pubmed ID
Authors

B. I. F. Batchelor, A. R. Hunt, I. C. J Bowler, D. W. M. Crook

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Unknown 3 75%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 1 25%
Unknown 3 75%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2015.
All research outputs
#7,532,940
of 22,985,065 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
#793
of 2,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,348
of 29,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,985,065 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,790 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,661 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.