↓ Skip to main content

Chemical proteomic analysis of 6-benzylaminopurine molecular partners in wheat grains

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Cell Reports, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Chemical proteomic analysis of 6-benzylaminopurine molecular partners in wheat grains
Published in
Plant Cell Reports, July 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00299-017-2174-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Radim Simerský, Ivo Chamrád, Jindřich Kania, Miroslav Strnad, Marek Šebela, René Lenobel

Abstract

An affinity-based chemical proteomic technique enabled direct identification of BAP-interacting proteins in wheat, including the well-known cytokinin-binder, cytokinin-binding protein 1. In this work, we show the development of a chemical proteomic technique for the identification of proteins binding to natural aromatic cytokinins (CKs). 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP) and documented CK-binder, wheat germ-allocated cytokinin-binding protein 1 (CBP-1), were suggested as an ideal proof-of concept affinity pair. Therefore, wheat grains were chosen as a model plant material. The BAP affinity beads were prepared by the immobilization of synthesized BAP-derived ligand to a commercial, pre-activated resin and used to isolate target proteins. The proteomic analysis of complex plant extracts is often complicated by the presence of highly abundant background proteins; in this case, the omnipresent alpha-amylase inhibitors (AAIs). To cope with this problem, we included SDS-PAGE, in-gel trypsin digestion and fraction pooling prior to shotgun analysis, which brought about an obvious drop in the signals belonging to the obstructing proteins. This was accompanied by a sharp increase in the number of identified BAP targets in comparison to a conventional in-solution digestion approach. To distinguish specific CK-binding proteins from those having a general affinity for nucleotide-like compounds, competitive pull-downs with natural nucleotides and free BAP were included in every affinity experiment. By this approach, we were able to identify a group of BAP-interacting proteins, which were subsequently found to be related to biological processes affected by CKs. Moreover, the selected affinity enrichment strategy was verified by the detection of the aforementioned CK-interacting protein, CBP-1. We propose that the developed method represents a promising tool for appealing research of as yet unknown CK molecular partners in plants.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 62%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 19%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 5%
Unspecified 1 5%
Unknown 2 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 71%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 10%
Unspecified 1 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 5%
Unknown 2 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2020.
All research outputs
#13,868,046
of 22,985,065 outputs
Outputs from Plant Cell Reports
#1,596
of 2,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,068
of 313,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Cell Reports
#34
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,985,065 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,195 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,004 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.