↓ Skip to main content

Recruitment success of different fish stocks in the North Sea in relation to climate variability

Overview of attention for article published in Ocean Dynamics, September 1997
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
Title
Recruitment success of different fish stocks in the North Sea in relation to climate variability
Published in
Ocean Dynamics, September 1997
DOI 10.1007/bf02764039
Authors

Joachim W. Dippner

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Iceland 1 2%
Denmark 1 2%
Unknown 49 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 25%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 7 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 58%
Environmental Science 10 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 2%
Unknown 9 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2016.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Ocean Dynamics
#163
of 1,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,309
of 28,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ocean Dynamics
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,036 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 28,405 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them