| Title |
Clonal vs leaf-height-seed (LHS) traits: which are filtered more strongly across habitats?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Folia Geobotanica, July 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12224-017-9292-1 |
| Authors |
Anna E.-Vojtkó, Martin Freitag, Alessandro Bricca, Felipe Martello, Joaquín Moreno Compañ, Martin Küttim, Róbert Kun, Francesco de Bello, Jitka Klimešová, Lars Götzenberger |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 50% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 17% |
| Researcher | 7 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 9 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 45% |
| Environmental Science | 12 | 26% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 11 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2017.
All research outputs
#13,046,072
of 22,986,950 outputs
Outputs from Folia Geobotanica
#86
of 243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,374
of 313,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Folia Geobotanica
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,986,950 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 243 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,319 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.