| Title |
Optimal sampling strategies for capture of genetic diversity differ between core and peripheral populations of Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Genetics, June 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10592-007-9353-8 |
| Authors |
Washington J. Gapare, Alvin D. Yanchuk, Sally N. Aitken |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
| Guatemala | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 63 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 26 | 39% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 7% |
| Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Unknown | 7 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 40 | 60% |
| Environmental Science | 9 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 10% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 7 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2015.
All research outputs
#4,202,506
of 22,986,950 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics
#251
of 1,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,715
of 69,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,986,950 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,048 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,109 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them