| Title |
The Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, Module 4: Revised Algorithm and Standardized Severity Scores
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10803-014-2080-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vanessa Hus, Catherine Lord |
| Abstract |
The recently published Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, 2nd edition (ADOS-2) includes revised diagnostic algorithms and standardized severity scores for modules used to assess younger children. A revised algorithm and severity scores are not yet available for Module 4, used with verbally fluent adults. The current study revises the Module 4 algorithm and calibrates raw overall and domain totals to provide metrics of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) symptom severity. Sensitivity and specificity of the revised Module 4 algorithm exceeded 80 % in the overall sample. Module 4 calibrated severity scores provide quantitative estimates of ASD symptom severity that are relatively independent of participant characteristics. These efforts increase comparability of ADOS scores across modules and should facilitate efforts to examine symptom trajectories from toddler to adulthood. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Qatar | 1 | 13% |
| Canada | 1 | 13% |
| France | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
| Scientists | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 387 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 379 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 70 | 18% |
| Researcher | 54 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 35 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 34 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 9% |
| Other | 77 | 20% |
| Unknown | 84 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 139 | 36% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 10% |
| Neuroscience | 32 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 3% |
| Other | 46 | 12% |
| Unknown | 105 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2023.
All research outputs
#2,348,581
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#1,007
of 5,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,059
of 236,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#13
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,584 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.