| Title |
Tales of Decline: Reading Social Pathology into Individual Suicide in South India
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11013-012-9257-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jocelyn Lim Chua |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 76 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 19% |
| Researcher | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 17 | 22% |
| Unknown | 14 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 23 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 15% |
| Psychology | 10 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 20 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2012.
All research outputs
#5,012,530
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry
#322
of 622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,892
of 159,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry
#11
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 622 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 159,221 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.