↓ Skip to main content

Early identification of MCI converting to AD: a FDG PET study

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
Title
Early identification of MCI converting to AD: a FDG PET study
Published in
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, June 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00259-017-3761-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marco Pagani, Flavio Nobili, Silvia Morbelli, Dario Arnaldi, Alessandro Giuliani, Johanna Öberg, Nicola Girtler, Andrea Brugnolo, Agnese Picco, Matteo Bauckneht, Roberta Piva, Andrea Chincarini, Gianmario Sambuceti, Cathrine Jonsson, Fabrizio De Carli

Abstract

Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is a transitional pathological stage between normal ageing (NA) and Alzheimer's disease (AD). Although subjects with MCI show a decline at different rates, some individuals remain stable or even show an improvement in their cognitive level after some years. We assessed the accuracy of FDG PET in discriminating MCI patients who converted to AD from those who did not. FDG PET was performed in 42 NA subjects, 27 MCI patients who had not converted to AD at 5 years (nc-MCI; mean follow-up time 7.5 ± 1.5 years), and 95 MCI patients who converted to AD within 5 years (MCI-AD; mean conversion time 1.8 ± 1.1 years). Relative FDG uptake values in 26 meta-volumes of interest were submitted to ANCOVA and support vector machine analyses to evaluate regional differences and discrimination accuracy. The MCI-AD group showed significantly lower FDG uptake values in the temporoparietal cortex than the other two groups. FDG uptake values in the nc-MCI group were similar to those in the NA group. Support vector machine analysis discriminated nc-MCI from MCI-AD patients with an accuracy of 89% (AUC 0.91), correctly detecting 93% of the nc-MCI patients. In MCI patients not converting to AD within a minimum follow-up time of 5 years and MCI patients converting within 5 years, baseline FDG PET and volume-based analysis identified those who converted with an accuracy of 89%. However, further analysis is needed in patients with amnestic MCI who convert to a dementia other than AD.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 117 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 12%
Student > Bachelor 13 11%
Student > Master 12 10%
Other 6 5%
Other 21 18%
Unknown 27 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 23%
Neuroscience 15 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 6%
Psychology 7 6%
Computer Science 5 4%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 39 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2017.
All research outputs
#1,515,594
of 23,806,312 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
#74
of 3,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,089
of 316,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
#1
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,806,312 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,083 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,585 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.