↓ Skip to main content

Review of research on Dendrobium, a prized folk medicine

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
303 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
Title
Review of research on Dendrobium, a prized folk medicine
Published in
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, February 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00253-011-3829-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tzi Bun Ng, Jingyi Liu, Jack Ho Wong, Xiujuan Ye, Stephen Cho Wing Sze, Yao Tong, Kalin Yanbo Zhang

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Singapore 1 1%
Unknown 93 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 18%
Student > Bachelor 15 16%
Researcher 8 8%
Student > Master 8 8%
Lecturer 5 5%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 28 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 16%
Chemistry 6 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 5%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 28 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2013.
All research outputs
#19,611,252
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#6,478
of 8,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#204,892
of 255,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#71
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,034 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,429 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.