↓ Skip to main content

New method for correction of lumbo-sacral kyphosis deformity in patient with high pelvic incidence

Overview of attention for article published in European Spine Journal, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
New method for correction of lumbo-sacral kyphosis deformity in patient with high pelvic incidence
Published in
European Spine Journal, July 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00586-017-5205-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marcin Czyz, Stephen Forster, James Holton, Babak Shariati, David J. Clarkson, Bronek M. Boszczyk

Abstract

Technical note. We describe a novel technique of bilateral longitudinal sacral osteotomy allowing direct reduction of high pelvic incidence (PI) and correction of sagittal imbalance. A 25-year-old female patient presented with a disabling lumbo-sacral kyphosis fused in situ through previous operations with residual low-grade wound infection and grade IV L5/S1 spondylolisthesis with severity index (SI) of 65%. A two-stage correction was performed. First anterior in situ fixation of the L4-L5-S1 segments was performed using a hollow modular anchorages (HMA) screw and L3/L4 anterior interbody cage. The second stage consisted of instrumentation of the lower lumbar spine and pelvis; placement of an S1 transverse K-wire as pivot point and bilateral longitudinal sacral osteotomy which allowed for gradual retroversion of the central sacrum relative to the pelvis. Sacrum was derotated by 30° which allowed to restore spinal sagittal balance and decrease SI by 15%. Postoperative recovery was complicated by a flare up of the pre-existing deep wound infection. Bilateral longitudinal sacral osteotomy appears to be a safe and efficient way of correcting the sagittal imbalance caused by an extremely high PI. Although technically demanding, it achieves good radiological and functional outcomes and avoids entering the spinal canal.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 17%
Student > Bachelor 4 17%
Other 3 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Other 5 22%
Unknown 5 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 9%
Unspecified 1 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 5 22%