| Title |
TCDD-induced chick cardiotoxicity is abolished by a selective cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor NS398
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Toxicology, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00204-014-1225-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nozomi Fujisawa, Shouta M. M. Nakayama, Yoshinori Ikenaka, Mayumi Ishizuka |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 33% |
| Researcher | 2 | 13% |
| Professor | 1 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 5 | 33% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 7% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 3 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2015.
All research outputs
#7,533,912
of 22,986,950 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Toxicology
#966
of 2,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,280
of 224,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Toxicology
#7
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,986,950 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,652 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,351 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.