| Title |
The determination of porosity and cellulose content of plant fibers by density methods
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Materials Science Letters, December 2001
|
| DOI | 10.1023/a:1013703809964 |
| Authors |
L. Y. Mwaikambo, M. P. Ansell |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Pakistan | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 125 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 23% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 15% |
| Researcher | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 12% |
| Unknown | 23 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 28 | 22% |
| Materials Science | 27 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 11% |
| Chemistry | 11 | 9% |
| Chemical Engineering | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 10% |
| Unknown | 30 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2012.
All research outputs
#4,365,789
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science Letters
#16
of 595 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,194
of 132,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science Letters
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 595 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them