Title |
Glowing in the dark: discriminating patterns of bioluminescence from different taxa during the Arctic polar night
|
---|---|
Published in |
Polar Biology, March 2014
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00300-014-1471-4 |
Authors |
Geir Johnsen, Mauro Candeloro, Jørgen Berge, Mark Moline |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 46 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 25% |
Researcher | 9 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 17% |
Student > Master | 5 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 10 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 40% |
Environmental Science | 10 | 21% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 4% |
Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 12 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2016.
All research outputs
#4,216,139
of 22,986,950 outputs
Outputs from Polar Biology
#321
of 1,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,931
of 221,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Polar Biology
#3
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,986,950 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,656 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,798 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.