↓ Skip to main content

Developmental validation of the MiSeq FGx Forensic Genomics System for Targeted Next Generation Sequencing in Forensic DNA Casework and Database Laboratories

Overview of attention for article published in Forensic Science International: Genetics, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
patent
3 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
237 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
295 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Developmental validation of the MiSeq FGx Forensic Genomics System for Targeted Next Generation Sequencing in Forensic DNA Casework and Database Laboratories
Published in
Forensic Science International: Genetics, January 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.fsigen.2017.01.011
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anne C. Jäger, Michelle L. Alvarez, Carey P. Davis, Ernesto Guzmán, Yonmee Han, Lisa Way, Paulina Walichiewicz, David Silva, Nguyen Pham, Glorianna Caves, Jocelyne Bruand, Felix Schlesinger, Stephanie J.K. Pond, Joe Varlaro, Kathryn M. Stephens, Cydne L. Holt

Abstract

Human DNA profiling using PCR at polymorphic short tandem repeat (STR) loci followed by capillary electrophoresis (CE) size separation and length-based allele typing has been the standard in the forensic community for over 20 years. Over the last decade, Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) matured rapidly, bringing modern advantages to forensic DNA analysis. The MiSeq FGx™ Forensic Genomics System, comprised of the ForenSeq™ DNA Signature Prep Kit, MiSeq FGx™ Reagent Kit, MiSeq FGx™ instrument and ForenSeq™ Universal Analysis Software, uses PCR to simultaneously amplify up to 231 forensic loci in a single multiplex reaction. Targeted loci include Amelogenin, 27 common, forensic autosomal STRs, 24 Y-STRs, 7 X-STRs and three classes of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). The ForenSeq™ kit includes two primer sets: Amelogenin, 58 STRs and 94 identity informative SNPs (iiSNPs) are amplified using DNA Primer Set A (DPMA; 153 loci); if a laboratory chooses to generate investigative leads using DNA Primer Set B, amplification is targeted to the 153 loci in DPMA plus 22 phenotypic informative (piSNPs) and 56 biogeographical ancestry SNPs (aiSNPs). High-resolution genotypes, including detection of intra-STR sequence variants, are semi-automatically generated with the ForenSeq™ software. This system was subjected to developmental validation studies according to the 2012 Revised SWGDAM Validation Guidelines. A two-step PCR first amplifies the target forensic STR and SNP loci (PCR1); unique, sample-specific indexed adapters or "barcodes" are attached in PCR2. Approximately 1736 ForenSeq™ reactions were analyzed. Studies include DNA substrate testing (cotton swabs, FTA cards, filter paper), species studies from a range of nonhuman organisms, DNA input sensitivity studies from 1ng down to 7.8pg, two-person human DNA mixture testing with three genotype combinations, stability analysis of partially degraded DNA, and effects of five commonly encountered PCR inhibitors. Calculations from ForenSeq™ STR and SNP repeatability and reproducibility studies (1ng template) indicate 100.0% accuracy of the MiSeq FGx™ System in allele calling relative to CE for STRs (1260 samples), and >99.1% accuracy relative to bead array typing for SNPs (1260 samples for iiSNPs, 310 samples for aiSNPs and piSNPs), with >99.0% and >97.8% precision, respectively. Call rates of >99.0% were observed for all STRs and SNPs amplified with both ForenSeq™ primer mixes. Limitations of the MiSeq FGx™ System are discussed. Results described here demonstrate that the MiSeq FGx™ System meets forensic DNA quality assurance guidelines with robust, reliable, and reproducible performance on samples of various quantities and qualities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 295 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 295 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 52 18%
Researcher 45 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 12%
Student > Bachelor 31 11%
Other 14 5%
Other 43 15%
Unknown 76 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 106 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 48 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 3%
Chemistry 9 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 2%
Other 30 10%
Unknown 86 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,580,941
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Forensic Science International: Genetics
#71
of 1,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,750
of 422,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Forensic Science International: Genetics
#4
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,342 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,653 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.