↓ Skip to main content

An ecosystem engineer, the beaver, increases species richness at the landscape scale

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, June 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#28 of 4,909)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
22 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
469 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
905 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
An ecosystem engineer, the beaver, increases species richness at the landscape scale
Published in
Oecologia, June 2002
DOI 10.1007/s00442-002-0929-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Justin P. Wright, Clive G. Jones, Alexander S. Flecker

Abstract

Ecosystem engineering - the physical modification of habitats by organisms - has been proposed as an important mechanism for maintaining high species richness at the landscape scale by increasing habitat heterogeneity. Dams built by beaver (Castor canadensis) dramatically alter riparian landscapes throughout much of North America. In the central Adirondacks, New York, USA, ecosystem engineering by beaver leads to the formation of extensive wetland habitat capable of supporting herbaceous plant species not found elsewhere in the riparian zone. We show that by increasing habitat heterogeneity, beaver increase the number of species of herbaceous plants in the riparian zone by over 33% at a scale that encompasses both beaver-modified patches and patches with no history of beaver occupation. We suggest that ecosystem engineers will increase species richness at the landscape scale whenever there are species present in a landscape that are restricted to engineered habitats during at least some stages of their life cycle.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 905 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 18 2%
Brazil 13 1%
United Kingdom 5 <1%
Canada 5 <1%
Argentina 5 <1%
Mexico 4 <1%
South Africa 3 <1%
Chile 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Other 13 1%
Unknown 833 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 154 17%
Researcher 151 17%
Student > Master 150 17%
Student > Bachelor 137 15%
Professor 39 4%
Other 147 16%
Unknown 127 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 405 45%
Environmental Science 240 27%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 53 6%
Social Sciences 14 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 1%
Other 38 4%
Unknown 144 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 99. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2023.
All research outputs
#434,486
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#28
of 4,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#299
of 127,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#1
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,909 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,793 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.