You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Gene–environment interactions involving functional variants: Results from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Cancer, August 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1002/ijc.30859 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Myrto Barrdahl, Anja Rudolph, John L. Hopper, Melissa C. Southey, Annegien Broeks, Peter A. Fasching, Matthias W. Beckmann, Manuela Gago‐Dominguez, J. Esteban Castelao, Pascal Guénel, Thérèse Truong, Stig E. Bojesen, Susan M. Gapstur, Mia M. Gaudet, Hermann Brenner, Volker Arndt, Hiltrud Brauch, Ute Hamann, Arto Mannermaa, Diether Lambrechts, Lynn Jongen, Dieter Flesch‐Janys, Kathrin Thoene, Fergus J. Couch, Graham G. Giles, Jacques Simard, Mark S. Goldberg, Jonine Figueroa, Kyriaki Michailidou, Manjeet K. Bolla, Joe Dennis, Qin Wang, Ursula Eilber, Sabine Behrens, Kamila Czene, Per Hall, Angela Cox, Simon Cross, Anthony Swerdlow, Minouk J. Schoemaker, Alison M. Dunning, Rudolf Kaaks, Paul D.P. Pharoah, Marjanka Schmidt, Montserrat Garcia‐Closas, Douglas F. Easton, Roger L. Milne, Jenny Chang‐Claude |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 53 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 13% |
| Professor | 7 | 13% |
| Researcher | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 15% |
| Unknown | 17 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 18 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2020.
All research outputs
#21,285,712
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Cancer
#11,299
of 12,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#257,993
of 331,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Cancer
#71
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,531 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,196 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.