Title |
Greater risk of hip fracture in hemodialysis than in peritoneal dialysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Osteoporosis International, February 2014
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00198-014-2632-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Y.-J. Chen, P.-T. Kung, Y.-H. Wang, C.-C. Huang, S.-C. Hsu, W.-C. Tsai, H.-C. Hsu |
Abstract |
Several differences may have existed between patients treated with peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis because of the difference in dialysis modality. This nationwide population-based cohort study demonstrated that patients on hemodialysis had an increased risk of hip fracture compared to patients on peritoneal dialysis; the hazard ratio was 1.52. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 50% |
Netherlands | 1 | 13% |
India | 1 | 13% |
Mexico | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
Scientists | 2 | 25% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 2% |
Canada | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 43 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 5 | 11% |
Researcher | 5 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 11% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 9% |
Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
Other | 12 | 27% |
Unknown | 10 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 44% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 11% |
Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Unknown | 13 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2017.
All research outputs
#3,861,395
of 23,905,714 outputs
Outputs from Osteoporosis International
#676
of 3,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,948
of 227,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Osteoporosis International
#10
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,905,714 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,752 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,699 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.