↓ Skip to main content

Release of polyester and cotton fibers from textiles in machine washings

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Science and Pollution Research, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
8 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
180 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
322 Mendeley
Title
Release of polyester and cotton fibers from textiles in machine washings
Published in
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, July 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11356-017-9621-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Markus Sillanpää, Pirjo Sainio

Abstract

Microplastics are widely spread in the environment, which along with still increasing production have aroused concern of their impacts on environmental health. The objective of this study is to quantify the number and mass of two most common textile fibers discharged from sequential machine washings to sewers. The number and mass of microfibers released from polyester and cotton textiles in the first wash varied in the range 2.1 × 10(5) to 1.3 × 10(7) and 0.12 to 0.33% w/w, respectively. Amounts of released microfibers showed a decreasing trend in sequential washes. The annual emission of polyester and cotton microfibers from household washing machines was estimated to be 154,000 (1.0 × 10(14)) and 411,000 kg (4.9 × 10(14)) in Finland (population 5.5 × 10(6)). Due to the high emission values and sorption capacities, the polyester and cotton microfibers may play an important role in the transport and fate of chemical pollutants in the aquatic environment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 322 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 322 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 16%
Student > Master 39 12%
Researcher 38 12%
Student > Bachelor 31 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 4%
Other 36 11%
Unknown 113 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 69 21%
Engineering 27 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 5%
Chemical Engineering 13 4%
Chemistry 12 4%
Other 48 15%
Unknown 136 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,609,221
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
#266
of 11,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,654
of 330,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
#5
of 239 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,212 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,767 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 239 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.