↓ Skip to main content

How Groups Affect Our Health and Well‐Being: The Path from Theory to Policy

Overview of attention for article published in Social Issues and Policy Review, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#29 of 116)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
275 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
356 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How Groups Affect Our Health and Well‐Being: The Path from Theory to Policy
Published in
Social Issues and Policy Review, January 2014
DOI 10.1111/sipr.12003
Authors

Jolanda Jetten, Catherine Haslam, S. Alexander Haslam, Genevieve Dingle, Janelle M. Jones

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 356 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 352 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 69 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 60 17%
Student > Bachelor 41 12%
Researcher 26 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 6%
Other 47 13%
Unknown 93 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 151 42%
Social Sciences 30 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 8 2%
Other 39 11%
Unknown 104 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2020.
All research outputs
#1,206,019
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Social Issues and Policy Review
#29
of 116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,969
of 326,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Issues and Policy Review
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 116 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,490 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them