↓ Skip to main content

Going to the extremes

Overview of attention for article published in Climatic Change, March 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
386 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Going to the extremes
Published in
Climatic Change, March 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10584-007-9247-2
Authors

Claudia Tebaldi, Katharine Hayhoe, Julie M. Arblaster, Gerald A. Meehl

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 386 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 20 5%
Switzerland 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
Argentina 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Other 14 4%
Unknown 335 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 122 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 90 23%
Student > Master 40 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 28 7%
Professor 23 6%
Other 51 13%
Unknown 32 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 116 30%
Environmental Science 91 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 70 18%
Engineering 20 5%
Social Sciences 10 3%
Other 34 9%
Unknown 45 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2007.
All research outputs
#7,533,912
of 22,986,950 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#5,080
of 5,824 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,261
of 76,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#69
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,986,950 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,824 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,300 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.