↓ Skip to main content

Flowers, Nectar and Insect Visits: Evaluating British Plant Species for Pollinator-friendly Gardens

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Botany, April 1999
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
22 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
99 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
305 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Flowers, Nectar and Insect Visits: Evaluating British Plant Species for Pollinator-friendly Gardens
Published in
Annals of Botany, April 1999
DOI 10.1006/anbo.1998.0835
Authors

LIVIO COMBA, SARAH A. CORBET, LYNN HUNT, BEN WARREN

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 305 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Hungary 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Argentina 2 <1%
Malta 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Other 4 1%
Unknown 284 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 67 22%
Researcher 64 21%
Student > Master 45 15%
Student > Bachelor 33 11%
Other 16 5%
Other 54 18%
Unknown 26 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 189 62%
Environmental Science 53 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 1%
Social Sciences 2 <1%
Other 13 4%
Unknown 38 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,631,912
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Botany
#277
of 3,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#784
of 37,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Botany
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,723 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 37,032 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them