↓ Skip to main content

Near and Far-Field Properties of Nanoprisms with Rounded Edges

Overview of attention for article published in Plasmonics, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Near and Far-Field Properties of Nanoprisms with Rounded Edges
Published in
Plasmonics, March 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11468-014-9671-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bartłomiej Grześkiewicz, Krzysztof Ptaszyński, Michał Kotkowiak

Abstract

Photonic devices can be developed, and their working principle can be understood only by considering the phenomena taking place at the nanoscale level. Optical properties of plasmonic structures depend on their geometric parameters and are sensitive to them. Recently, many advanced methods for the preparation of nanostructures have been proposed; however still, the geometric parameters are inaccurate. Numerical simulations provide a powerful tool for the analysis of plasmonic nanostructures. To the best of our knowledge, there are not many papers on near-field and far-field properties of single nanoprism and nanoprism dimer, the so-called bowtie, with rounded edges. For this purpose, Finite Integration Technique implemented to the CST Microwave Studio was used. Besides the edge rounding, an additional modification of the resonance modes was investigated, achieved by placement of a spherical nanoparticle in the gap between the prisms. Results of numerical simulations indicate that the radius of the curvature edges strongly affects the plasmon peak localization, and this effect cannot be neglected in plasmonic device design. Increase in the radius of edge curvature causes main extinction cross-section peak blueshift in all cases analyzed. Moreover, our calculations imply that the nanoparticle in the gap between prisms strongly influences the dependence of spectral properties on the radius curvature.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Poland 1 2%
Unknown 43 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 41%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Master 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 2%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 10 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 11 25%
Chemistry 9 20%
Materials Science 5 11%
Engineering 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 10 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2014.
All research outputs
#15,295,786
of 22,747,498 outputs
Outputs from Plasmonics
#103
of 198 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,158
of 221,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plasmonics
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,747,498 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 198 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,148 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.