↓ Skip to main content

In Utero Evidence of Impaired Somatic Growth in Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Cardiology, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
In Utero Evidence of Impaired Somatic Growth in Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome
Published in
Pediatric Cardiology, July 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00246-017-1676-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jourdan E. Triebwasser, Marjorie C. Treadwell

Abstract

We hypothesized that fetuses with hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) have impaired growth compared to expected growth for gestational age. This is a retrospective cohort study including singleton fetuses with isolated HLHS identified from a single, referral center's ultrasound database. To account for variable timing of ultrasounds, z-scores for gestational age were assigned for each biometric parameter. We identified 169 fetuses, of which 96 had more than one ultrasound. The median number of ultrasound evaluations per fetus was 2 (range 1-5). The mean gestational age at time of last ultrasound was 33.7 ± 4.3 weeks with a range of 20.4-39.6 weeks. While fetal growth restriction (11%) and microcephaly (3%) were relatively rare, mean z-scores at the time of last ultrasound for estimated fetal weight (mean difference z-score -0.20, p = 0.04) and head circumference (-0.28, p = 0.02) were lower than at the time of the initial ultrasound. Impaired somatic growth, defined as a decrement in z-score of 0.5 or more over time, was common (32%). There is a deceleration in somatic and head growth in fetuses with hypoplastic left heart syndrome that can be identified by routine ultrasound evaluation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 20%
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 10%
Student > Postgraduate 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 10%
Unknown 3 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2017.
All research outputs
#18,820,431
of 23,323,574 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Cardiology
#883
of 1,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#240,210
of 313,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Cardiology
#15
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,323,574 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,432 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,465 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.