| Title |
Constituting neurologic subjects: Neuroscience, subjectivity and the mundane significance of the brain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Subjectivity, August 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1057/sub.2011.10 |
| Authors |
Martyn Pickersgill, Sarah Cunningham-Burley, Paul Martin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 44% |
| Mexico | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 50% |
| Scientists | 4 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 65 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 22% |
| Researcher | 6 | 9% |
| Professor | 6 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 21% |
| Unknown | 6 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 28 | 42% |
| Psychology | 9 | 13% |
| Arts and Humanities | 5 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Unknown | 9 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2016.
All research outputs
#2,056,238
of 25,721,020 outputs
Outputs from Subjectivity
#10
of 222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,390
of 132,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Subjectivity
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,721,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 222 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,350 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.