| Title |
Evidence of recent population bottlenecks and inbreeding in British populations of Bechstein’s bat, Myotis bechsteinii
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Genetics, July 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10592-008-9639-5 |
| Authors |
Christopher J. Durrant, Trevor J. C. Beebee, Frank Greenaway, David A. Hill |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Guatemala | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 76 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 22% |
| Researcher | 15 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 11% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 26 | 28% |
| Unknown | 6 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 69 | 75% |
| Environmental Science | 12 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
| Psychology | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 6 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2017.
All research outputs
#15,469,035
of 22,986,950 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics
#849
of 1,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,836
of 82,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics
#7
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,986,950 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,048 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,171 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.