↓ Skip to main content

Barriers to Adopting and Implementing Local-Level Tobacco Control Policies

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Community Health, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
Title
Barriers to Adopting and Implementing Local-Level Tobacco Control Policies
Published in
Journal of Community Health, December 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10900-010-9350-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Travis D. Satterlund, Diana Cassady, Jeanette Treiber, Cathy Lemp

Abstract

Although California communities have been relatively successful in adopting and implementing a wide range of local tobacco control policies, the process has not been without its setbacks and barriers. Little is known about local policy adoption, and this paper examines these processes related to adopting and implementing outdoor smoke-free policies, focusing on the major barriers faced by local-level tobacco control organizations in this process. Ninety-six projects funded by the California Tobacco Control Program submitted final evaluation reports pertaining to an outdoor smoking objective, and the reports from these projects were analyzed. The barriers were grouped in three primary areas: politically polarizing barriers, organizational barriers, and local political orientation. The barriers identified in this study underscore the need for an organized action plan in adopting local tobacco policy. The authors also suggest potential strategies to offset the barriers, including: (1) having a "champion" who helps to carry an objective forward; (2) tapping into a pool of youth volunteers; (3) collecting and using local data as a persuasive tool; (4) educating the community in smoke-free policy efforts; (5) working strategically within the local political climate; and (6) demonstrating to policymakers the constituent support for proposed policy.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 79 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 16%
Researcher 10 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Other 17 21%
Unknown 17 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 18 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 10%
Psychology 6 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 22 27%