↓ Skip to main content

Do smoke-free laws affect revenues in pubs and restaurants?

Overview of attention for article published in HEPAC Health Economics in Prevention and Care, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
Title
Do smoke-free laws affect revenues in pubs and restaurants?
Published in
HEPAC Health Economics in Prevention and Care, November 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10198-010-0287-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hans Olav Melberg, Karl E. Lund

Abstract

In the debate about laws regulating smoking in restaurants and pubs, there has been some controversy as to whether smoke-free laws would reduce revenues in the hospitality industry. Norway presents an interesting case for three reasons. First, it was among the first countries to implement smoke-free laws, so it is possible to assess the long-term effects. Second, it has a cold climate so if there is a negative effect on revenue one would expect to find it in Norway. Third, the data from Norway are detailed enough to distinguish between revenue from pubs and restaurants. Autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) intervention analysis of bi-monthly observations of revenues in restaurants and pubs show that the law did not have a statistically significant long-term effect on revenue in restaurants or on restaurant revenue as a share of personal consumption. Similar analysis for pubs shows that there was no significant long-run effect on pub revenue.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 20%
Researcher 9 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 8%
Other 10 20%
Unknown 7 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 22%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 10 20%
Social Sciences 6 12%
Arts and Humanities 3 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 6%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 9 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2021.
All research outputs
#4,369,647
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from HEPAC Health Economics in Prevention and Care
#275
of 1,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,882
of 187,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from HEPAC Health Economics in Prevention and Care
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,303 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them