↓ Skip to main content

Assessing the overlap between the diet of a coastal shark and the surrounding prey communities in a sub‐tropical embayment

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Fish Biology, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessing the overlap between the diet of a coastal shark and the surrounding prey communities in a sub‐tropical embayment
Published in
Journal of Fish Biology, March 2011
DOI 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2011.02945.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. N. Gutteridge, M. B. Bennett, C. Huveneers, I. R. Tibbetts

Abstract

An elasmobranch survey of sub-tropical Hervey Bay, Australia, captured the slit-eye shark Loxodon macrorhinus at only one of three sites sampled. The dietary composition of this small shark species was compared to the prey communities within Hervey Bay to test whether prey availability was driving this observation. Dietary analysis of prey groups revealed that teleosts dominated the diet, per cent index of relative importance, % I(RI) (79·5%) and per cent geometric index of importance, % G(II) (52·7%), with shrimp-like invertebrates and cephalopods identified as the most important invertebrate prey groups. Baited remote underwater video (BRUV) used to sample prey communities at each site, demonstrated a highly diverse and significantly different community composition among the sites. There was no significant overlap between the diet of L. macrorhinus and any of the prey communities detected by BRUVs according to one-way analysis of similarities and the simplified Morisita index. Habitat electivity analysis revealed affinity of L. macrorhinus for the site with the highest water clarity (Secchi disc depth), opposing that of three other shark species. Overall, the results suggest that the distribution of L. macrorhinus is not driven by prey availability but other factors such as water clarity, predator avoidance or a reduction in interspecies competition.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 3 2%
United States 2 2%
Turkey 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Arab Emirates 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Namibia 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 108 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 22%
Student > Master 22 18%
Researcher 18 15%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Other 7 6%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 19 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 67 55%
Environmental Science 17 14%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 2%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 19 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2011.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Fish Biology
#4,805
of 5,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,624
of 120,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Fish Biology
#16
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,119 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,786 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.