↓ Skip to main content

Scent of the familiar: An fMRI study of canine brain responses to familiar and unfamiliar human and dog odors

Overview of attention for article published in Behavioural Processes, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 2,213)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
94 news outlets
blogs
11 blogs
twitter
88 X users
facebook
37 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
6 Google+ users
video
7 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
95 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
400 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Scent of the familiar: An fMRI study of canine brain responses to familiar and unfamiliar human and dog odors
Published in
Behavioural Processes, March 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.02.011
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gregory S. Berns, Andrew M. Brooks, Mark Spivak

Abstract

Understanding dogs' perceptual experience of both conspecifics and humans is important to understand how dogs evolved and the nature of their relationships with humans and other dogs. Olfaction is believed to be dogs' most powerful and perhaps important sense and an obvious place to begin for the study of social cognition of conspecifics and humans. We used fMRI in a cohort of dogs (N=12) that had been trained to remain motionless while unsedated and unrestrained in the MRI. By presenting scents from humans and conspecifics, we aimed to identify the dimensions of dogs' responses to salient biological odors - whether they are based on species (dog or human), familiarity, or a specific combination of factors. We focused our analysis on the dog's caudate nucleus because of its well-known association with positive expectations and because of its clearly defined anatomical location. We hypothesized that if dogs' primary association to reward, whether it is based on food or social bonds, is to humans, then the human scents would activate the caudate more than the conspecific scents. Conversely, if the smell of conspecifics activated the caudate more than the smell of humans, dogs' association to reward would be stronger to their fellow canines. Five scents were presented (self, familiar human, strange human, familiar dog, strange dog). While the olfactory bulb/peduncle was activated to a similar degree by all the scents, the caudate was activated maximally to the familiar human. Importantly, the scent of the familiar human was not the handler, meaning that the caudate response differentiated the scent in the absence of the person being present. The caudate activation suggested that not only did the dogs discriminate that scent from the others, they had a positive association with it. This speaks to the power of the dog's sense of smell, and it provides important clues about the importance of humans in dogs' lives. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Canine Behavior.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 88 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 400 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hungary 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 390 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 70 18%
Student > Bachelor 67 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 13%
Student > Master 47 12%
Other 40 10%
Other 55 14%
Unknown 69 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 93 23%
Psychology 60 15%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 52 13%
Neuroscience 23 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 4%
Other 69 17%
Unknown 86 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 885. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2024.
All research outputs
#20,287
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from Behavioural Processes
#3
of 2,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99
of 236,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavioural Processes
#1
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,213 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,721 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.