↓ Skip to main content

Morphology and distribution of the ampullary electroreceptors in wobbegong sharks: implications for feeding behaviour

Overview of attention for article published in Marine Biology, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
Title
Morphology and distribution of the ampullary electroreceptors in wobbegong sharks: implications for feeding behaviour
Published in
Marine Biology, December 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00227-010-1595-1
Authors

Susan M. Theiss, Shaun P. Collin, Nathan S. Hart

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Unknown 79 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 17%
Student > Master 10 12%
Researcher 9 11%
Other 3 4%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 17 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 46 57%
Environmental Science 8 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 2%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 18 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2020.
All research outputs
#7,406,413
of 22,647,730 outputs
Outputs from Marine Biology
#1,236
of 3,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,750
of 179,651 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marine Biology
#9
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,647,730 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,651 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.