You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evolution of the Cancer Stem Cell Model
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cell Stem Cell, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.stem.2014.02.006 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Antonija Kreso, John E. Dick |
| Abstract |
Genetic analyses have shaped much of our understanding of cancer. However, it is becoming increasingly clear that cancer cells display features of normal tissue organization, where cancer stem cells (CSCs) can drive tumor growth. Although often considered as mutually exclusive models to describe tumor heterogeneity, we propose that the genetic and CSC models of cancer can be harmonized by considering the role of genetic diversity and nongenetic influences in contributing to tumor heterogeneity. We offer an approach to integrating CSCs and cancer genetic data that will guide the field in interpreting past observations and designing future studies. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 34% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 9% |
| France | 2 | 6% |
| Canada | 2 | 6% |
| Sweden | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 50% |
| Scientists | 13 | 41% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,444 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | <1% |
| Germany | 4 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 3 | <1% |
| Portugal | 3 | <1% |
| Italy | 3 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
| Chile | 2 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 19 | <1% |
| Unknown | 2384 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 566 | 23% |
| Researcher | 363 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 347 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 300 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 140 | 6% |
| Other | 298 | 12% |
| Unknown | 430 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 703 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 606 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 332 | 14% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 66 | 3% |
| Engineering | 47 | 2% |
| Other | 220 | 9% |
| Unknown | 470 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,107,122
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Cell Stem Cell
#760
of 2,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,652
of 238,710 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Stem Cell
#16
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,849 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 48.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,710 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.